Blog Layout

Bringing a Workplace Relations Commission Claim


Workplace Relations Commission Claims

Bringing a Workplace Relations Commission Complaint

In this article, we examine the key points to consider, before bringing a Workplace Relations Commission complaint against your employer. 

Enforcing Employment Rights


The Workplace Relations Act 2015 established the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) replacing the Labour Relations Commission, Rights Commissioner Service, Equality Tribunal, and National Employment Rights Authority. Please consult an employment solicitor to advise of the various heads of claim that may be applicable to a workplace dispute.


WRC Adjudication


Adjudication Officers inquire into complaints or disputes, give the parties to the complaint or dispute an opportunity to be heard by the Adjudication Officer and to present to him\her any evidence relevant to the complaint or dispute and make a decision in relation to the complaint or dispute in accordance with the relevant redress provision. 


Date of Complaint


In general, Adjudication Officers cannot entertain a complaint if it has been presented to the Director General of the WRC after the expiration of the period of 6 months beginning on the date of the contravention, unless there are exceptional circumstances.


Excusing Delay of Complaint


In considering if reasonable cause exists, it is for the employee to show that there are reasons which both explain the delay and afford an excuse for the delay. The explanation must be reasonable, that is to say it must make sense, be agreeable to reason and not be irrational or absurd. Please consult an employment solicitor if the date of the wrong is contested or uncertain.


Frivolous, Vexatious or Misconceived


Section 22 of the Workplace Relations Act states the Director of the Workplace Commission may dismiss a claim at any stage if it is of the opinion that it has been made in bad faith or as frivolous, vexatious or misconceived or relates to a trivial matter (e.g. if the employee has no reasonable chance in succeeding, then the law says that it is frivolous to bring the case). 


Exhausting Internal Procedure


The Adjudication Officer must be satisfied that the employee has brought his or her complaint to the attention of the employer, so that the employer has had an opportunity to address the matter internally (e.g. Conway v Ulster Bank, the WRC found that the employeet had not acted reasonably in resigning without first having “substantially utilised the grievance procedure to attempt to remedy her complaints.”)


Appealing a WRC Decision


If either party, the employer or the employee, is unhappy with the decision of the Adjudication Officer following a WRC hearing, they have 42 days from the date of the adjudication to make an appeal to the Labour Court. The subsequent hearing at the Labour Court will be on a 'de novo' basis, meaning the Labour Court hears the case again, from the beginning. 


Enforcing a WRC Decision


If an employer or employee fails to adhere to the final decision of the WRC or Labour Court , they may make an application directly to the District Court for an order directing the other party to comply with that decision.


Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: