Blog Layout

No Compensation for Successful Unfair Dismissal Claim


Compensation for Unfair Dismissal

Compensation for Unfair Dismissal Claim


Although an employee may bring their employer before the Workplace Relations Commission in respect of a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act, even if they are successful, an Adjudication Officer has, within their remit, the power to award a successful complainant no compensation depending on the circumstances.


In A Diver -V- A Limited Company (ADJ00018129), the Adjudication Officer in this matter, Ms Niamh O’Carroll Kelly BL, decided to award the complainant no compensation despite bringing a well founded case of unfair dismissal.


Counterclaim by Employer


In summary, the complainant was provided with approximately €10,000 worth of diver training. He was asked to undertake a very important and time sensitive task on behalf of the respondent company. When he arrived to undertake the task, he demanded more pay than had been agreed based on a previous rate he had been given in error. The manager and owner of the respondent company noted that the previous rate paid to him was an administrative error and was never agreed between the parties. He further noted that he had spent a considerable amount of money upskilling the complainant and now felt betrayed that the complainant was effectively trying to “blackmail” him as he knew the importance of this particular job, to the respondent company.


Summary Dismissal


The owner of the respondent company told the complainant “you’re finished”. The complainant contended that he was effectively dismissed from that moment. The owner of the respondent company later emailed the complainant to inform him that he was suspended pending an investigation and disciplinary process. He then invited the complainant to attend an investigatory meeting to discuss the issues before them. The complainant never attended the meeting arguing that he had already been dismissed and that there was no further issue to discuss.


He then submitted a claim seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Unfair Dismissals Act.


Behaviour of the Employee


The Adjudication Officer in this matter found that there had been an absence of due process and fair procedure with respect to the manner in which the complainant was dismissed.


Notwithstanding this, she did agree with the respondent that the complainant was effectively trying to blackmail the company and therefore, despite finding that the complainant’s complaint was well founded, she decided to award him no compensation.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: