Blog Layout

Part Time to Full Time


Part Time to Full Time

Can a part time employee be forced to work full time?


Ordinarily, no. A part time employee is usually entitled to remain a part time employee on the hours for which they were originally contracted. The contract of employment may contain a clause which refer to the amendment of working terms and conditions, but it would be most usual for an employer to be permitted to significantly change the working hours of an employee without their consultation and consent.


Part Time to Full Time - Changes under Irish Employment Law


An interesting case recently came before the Labour Court, on appeal from the Workplace Relations Commission, which examined some of the legal formalities to be completed when moving an employee from a part-time to a full-time position.


The complainant, Ms Mary Twohill, commenced employment with the respondent company, Windzor Pharma Ireland Limited, on 02 April 2018. The complainant’s contract noted that she would work 20 hours per week and that her salary would amount to €2,334 per month.


Approximately a hear later, on 23 May 2019, the complainant received a letter from the respondent company noting that they now required an individual to undertaker her role on a full-time basis.


The complainant protested but was ultimately dismissed on 30 June 2019.


The Workplace Relations Commission found that the complainant had been unfairly dismissed and awarded her €14,000 in compensation. The respondent company asserted that this award was not reasonable under the circumstances.


Part Time to Full Time - Mitigating Circumstances


The respondent company noted that they had made every possible attempt to retain the employee once the role had become a full-time position. They noted that the complainant was offered a full-time role or an alternative role on a commission only basis.


The respondent company also pointed out that the contract of employment clearly anticipated that the role may change to a full-time role as the company developed.


The Unfair Dismissals Act, at Section 1, notes that a dismissal in relation to an employee means “the termination by his employer of the employee’s contract of employment with the employer, whether prior notice of the termination was or was not given to the employee”. Section 6 of the Unfair Dismissals Act notes that “in determining for the purposes of this Act whether the dismissal of an employee was an unfair dismissal or not, it shall be for the employer to show that the dismissal was wholly or mainly from one or more of the matters specified in Sub-Section 4 of this Section or that there were other substantial grounds justifying the dismissal”.


Part Time to Full Time - Unfair Dismissal


The Labour Court held that there were not substantial grounds justifying the dismissal of the complainant in this instance.


The Labour Court noted that there was no substantial engagement with the complainant prior to the issuance of the letter, which noted that her role would be terminated.


The Labour Court noted that the contract of employment provided that “the company may require you to vary the pattern of your working hours if required on a temporary or permanent basis should the need of this post require this”. However, the Labour Court noted that, on plain reading of the contract of employment, it is clear that the changes relate to the pattern of working rather than the quantum of hours contractually required.


Furthermore, the Labour Court noted that, at no point was it argued by the respondent company that the part-time position was redundant.


Part Time to Full Time - Process and Procedure


Based on all of the evidence before it, the Labour Court concluded that the respondent company followed no discernible procedure in arriving at the decision to dismiss the complainant and furthermore offered the complainant no avenue of appeal of that decision. In those circumstances, the Labour Court concluded that the conduct of the respondent company in relation to the dismissal was unreasonable, thereby affirming the order of compensation made by the Workplace Relations Commission to the complainant.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: