Blog Layout

Perjury, Public and Published - The Workplace Relations (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2021


Introduction


Following delivery of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Zalewski v. Adjudication Officer and WRC, Ireland and the Attorney General [2021] IESC 24 on 6 April 2021, and the consequential orders made on foot thereof on 15 April 2021, a number of procedural changes are required to procedures at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).  It was the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court that in the context of the Zalewski case, that an Adjudication Officer of the WRC was engaged in the administration of justice.


Legislative Changes


The Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment met in May 2021 to discuss the matter, with Committee Cathaoirleach Deputy Maurice Quinlivan commenting: 


“This [proposed] legislation would provide the necessary powers for the Workplace Relations Commission to continue to administer justice in accordance with the Constitution and follows a recent Supreme Court judgement in the ‘Zalewski’ case. Given the urgency of the matter, the Minister has asked that the normal requirement in relation to pre-legislative scrutiny be waived on this occasion. The Committee will consider this request and looks forward to discussing the Bill with the Department before making a recommendation on a PLS waiver to the Business Committee.”


Workplace Relations (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill


The Workplace Relations (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2021, is currently under consideration by the Oireachtas.


Some of the key proposals are as follows:


1 Administration of Oath


Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 may be amended to —


“(12A) (a) An adjudication officer may require a person giving evidence in proceedings under this section to give such evidence on oath or affirmation and, for that purpose, cause to be administered an oath or affirmation to such person.


(b) A person who, in or for the purpose of proceedings under this section, gives a statement material in the proceedings while lawfully sworn as a witness that is false and that he or she knows to be false shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable—


(i) on summary conviction, to a class B fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, or both, or


(ii) on conviction on indictment, to a fine not exceeding €100,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years, or both.”


2 Proceedings in Public


There are a number of proposed amendments to ensure proceedings are conducted in public. For example:


Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 may be amended to —


“(13) Proceedings under this section shall be conducted in public unless the adjudication officer, of his or her own motion or upon the application by or on behalf of a party to the proceedings, determines that, due to the existence of special circumstances, the proceedings (or part thereof) should be conducted otherwise than in public.”


Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 may be amended to —


(a) by the substitution of the following subsection for subsection (6):


“(6) Proceedings under this section before an adjudication officer shall be conducted in public unless the adjudication officer, of his or her own motion or upon the application by or on behalf of a party to the proceedings, determines that, due to the existence of special circumstances, the proceedings (or part thereof) should be conducted otherwise than in public.”


Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 may be amended to —


“Proceedings in relation to any matter referred to an adjudication officer under this section shall be conducted in public unless the adjudication officer, of his or her own motion or upon the application by or on behalf of the employee or employer, determines that, due to the existence of special circumstances, the proceedings (or part thereof) should be conducted otherwise than in public.”


3 Publication on Internet


Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 may be amended to —


“(14) (a) Subject to paragraph (b), the Commission shall publish on the internet in such form and in such manner as it considers appropriate every decision of an adjudication officer under this section.


(b) In publishing a decision under paragraph (a), an adjudication officer may determine that, due to the existence of special circumstances, information that would identify the parties in relation to whom the decision was made should not be published by the Commission.”


Review of the Changes


There is a commitment to undertake a review of operation of the proposed changes.


13. (1) The Minister shall—


(a) not later than 12 months after this section comes into operation, commence a review of the operation of the amendments to:


(i) the Act of 2015 effected by section 4(b) and (c);

(ii) the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 effected by section 7,

(iii) the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 effected by section 9(a);

(iv) the Protection of Employees (Employers’ Insolvency) Act 1984 effected by section 10, in so far as it relates to the insertion, in section 9 of the said Act, 

of subsections (4C) and (4D);

(v) the Employment Equality Act 1998 effected by section 11(a);

(vi) the Equal Status Act 2000 effected by section 12(a), and


(b) not later than 12 months after the commencement of the said review, make a report to each House of the Oireachtas of the findings made on the review and of 35 the conclusions drawn from the findings.


Note: article published 29 June 2021 and subject to change.


Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: