Blog Layout

Proving an Employment Equality Claim in Ireland


Employment Equality in Ireland

Employment Equality Acts 


The Employment Equality Acts outlaw discriminatory treatment on any of the nine prohibited grounds in a broad reaching manner, covering not only exiting employment relationships but also the termination of those relationships. The nine grounds are:

  • Gender
  • Civil status
  • Family status
  • Sexual orientation
  • Religious belief
  • Age
  • Disability
  • Race, colour, nationality, ethnic or national origins
  • Membership of the Traveller community


There is no requirement for any minimum period of service to be cloaked with the protection of the Acts and therefore job applicants are protected from discrimination, harassment and victimisation. 


Discriminatory Treatment


Employment equality regulation outlaws discrimination in relation to access to employment, conditions of employment, pay, training or experience for or in relation to employment, promotion or regrading or classification of posts. The laws also prohibit the issuing by an employer of instructions to discriminate. Discriminatory dismissal (which includes constructive dismissal on any of the protected grounds) is also prohibited by the regulations. 


Multiple Discriminatory Acts


It has been recognised by the courts and Workplace Relations Commission that the combination of certain protected classes, such as race and gender or gender and disability, can cause less favourable treatment. This multiple, dual or combined discrimination is not expressly provided or legislated for within the Employment Equality Acts but nevertheless, such claims have been upheld.


Defining Discrimination


Discrimination is defined in a number of different ways in the Employment Equality Acts. Section 6(1) states that discrimination shall be taken to occur where a person is treated less favourable than another person is, has been or would be treated in a comparable situation on any of the discriminatory grounds. This definition is a very broad definition of discrimination and includes discrimination on a discriminatory ground which existed but no longer existed or which may exist in the future. 


Comparable Treatment


In general a complainant must prove less favourable treatment as compared with another person in a similar position to the complainant. Therefore without a comparator, the claim will fail and the choice of comparator is of significant importance to the success of any claim. The comparator cannot be selected out of context with other employees.


Hypothetical Comparator


The Labour Court has previously held that when no similar employee is available for comparison, it may allow the employee to reply on a hypothetical comparator. However, when a comparator is introduced, a successful claim will require demonstration of discrimination on each of the grounds alleged. 


Making an Equality Complaint 


 It is always recommended that employers be afforded an opportunity to address any workplace concerns, complaints or grievances, in the first instance. If an employee does not achieve an adequate response, they may bring a claim to the Workplace Relations Commission, where the matter may be adjudicated. 


Engaging an Employment Solicitor


By engaging an employment solicitor to assist with a workplace dispute, an employer or employee can rest assured that they are fully briefed on the options available. Crushell & Co have a track record of achieving successful outcomes for clients through both formal and informal processes.

Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: