Blog Layout

What does 'Without Prejudice' Mean? Settlement Agreement Law


What does 'Without Prejudice' Mean?

What does ‘Without Prejudice’ and ‘Subject to Contract’ mean?


In this article, we examine what the phrases 'without prejudice' and 'subject to contract' mean in the context of a settlement agreement, sometimes referred to as ‘exit agreements’, ‘compromise agreements’, or ‘termination agreements’, under Irish employment law.


The main legal impact of a settlement agreement is that it will prevent an employee from bringing any future claim against the employer.


The consequences of such an agreement cannot be overstated, particularly if there is or was a dispute between the parties. 


Although a settlement agreement, is often intended to finalize any employment law dispute between the parties, an employee may also be waiving any other right they have, to bring any legal claim, against their employer. 

The execution of a settlement agreement often comes down to a simple risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis.


For the employer, he or she will be looking at the likelihood of a case being taken against him, the chances of success, and a calculation of a potential award if the claim is successful. To insulate themselves from that risk, they may offer more favourable terms to the departing employee, in return for their agreeing not to pursue any claim or litigation against the employer.


For the employee, he or she may have a legitimate claim against the employer, however, there is never any guarantee of success, when one initiates a workplace claim, particularly before the Workplace Relations Commission. Therefore, he or she may also undertake their own risk analysis and cost-benefit assessment, to determine their own likelihood of success, in bringing a claim, the potential costs involved, as well as the likelihood of an award.


'Without Prejudice' - Making an Offer Private


When a settlement agreement is often put before an employee, it is on the basis that, should the employee refuse to accept it, he or she will be precluded from relying on that proposal, in any form, in any future litigation. 


By marking the document has being ‘without prejudice’ and ‘subject to contract’, an employer prevents the proposal from having any legal standing, until such time as it is executed by both parties, thereby affording both parties, an opportunity to freely negotiate the terms of the agreement, without fear that their respective positions, can be used against him, if any dispute between them, isn’t settled throughout the negotiation process.


Until such time as the agreement is signed by both the employer and employee, it has no legal standing.


Advice on Settlement Agreements


Any employee considering executing a settlement agreement, needs clear and concise advice on the potential consequences of signing such an agreement. In order for them to be fully appraised, they need to know what their potential legal rights are. For that reason, we always advise, that employees obtain their independent legal advice, from a specialist employment solicitor, who is fully aware of all of the potential actions that an employee may take. 


Employee should know what potential complaints they may be in a position to raise, the likelihood of success, the cost of bringing such a claim, and the potential awards. It is only through an understanding of what the alternatives to a settlement agreement are, that an employee can be considered to be fully informed as to the consequences of signing that agreement and waiving their employment rights.

Please click HERE for a downloadable 'Guide to Settlement Agreements under Irish Employment Law'.



Share

Compensation for workplace stress & anxiety
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
Psychological damage is difficult to measure and quantify, making it difficult for assessors to determine its impact. The Personal Injuries Guidelines were established by the Judicial Council in 2021 under the Judicial Council Act 2019 to identify appropriate levels of damages for different forms of personal injuries. The guidelines aim to enhance understanding of the evaluation and allocation of compensation for personal injuries to achieve more uniformity in awards.
How much compensation for stress at work?
by RG343171 11 Mar, 2024
In this article, we examine the circumstances that give rise to a personal injuries claim for the stress and anxiety caused by a toxic working environment.
13 Feb, 2024
The case of Electricity Supply Board -v- Kieran Sharkey [2024] IEHC 65 examines whether an employee has a right to silence in the context of workplace investigations. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) (the Plaintiff) brought a case against Mr Sharkey (the Defendant) alleging that his failure to answer certain questions, in the context of a workplace investigations that was also subject to parallel criminal proceedings, amounted to a repudiation of his contract of employment or, in the alternative, that the ESB was entitled to treat his contract of employment as having been terminated by him.
Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999
26 Jan, 2024
The Form 3 is used when an individual wants to make a representation to the Minister for Justice and Equality pursuant to Section 3 of the Immigration Act, 1999. It is an appeal to a decision of the Minister for Justice in respect of an immigration application.
Determining an Employer
03 Jan, 2024
The case of Amanda Craddock v Head–Hunt International Limited (ADJ00036831) examines the circumstances under which a redundancy payment would ordinarily be payable to an agency worker.
Claims before the WRC
18 Dec, 2023
In this article, we consider what will be considered frivolous or vexatious, by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), when a complaint is presented to them we do so by examining several claims initiated by Mr. Leon O’Connor against various companies.
Show More
Share by: